Super Island Tycoon-Chapter 653 - 652 Logical Problem

If Jiang Cheng really insists on doing things his own way, Yang Jiqian, besides being angry, has no way to oppose him.

But Jiang Cheng does not want to solve the problem in this way. Although he knows that he is correct, doing so would harm Yang Jiqian's enthusiasm for research.

If Jiang Cheng disregards Yang Jiqian's feelings this time and forcibly negates all the theoretical models she proposed, it will be a problem if Yang borrows even next time, and whether she will put her heart into the research.

Maybe this time Yang Jiqian brought out five theoretical models. Next time, there might not even be one.

Jiang Cheng doesn't want to dampen Yang Jiqian's enthusiasm, as it would be detrimental to her future development.

Jiang Cheng is optimistic about Yang Jiqian's future, so he would never do that.

"I think it's better for us to first take a look at each other's theoretical models. Right now, we don't even understand each other's theories, so making judgments isn't a way."

We can first have a focused discussion together to see which model better fits the nature of dark matter, which can also help us work more efficiently.

After all, perhaps one cannot see clearly with their own theory, but others can examine those theories from different perspectives.

Finally, Jiang Cheng proposed a compromise, which was to first look at each other's theoretical models, then discuss how to solve the problem. This plan is indeed very good, at least allowing the other party to first look at their own theory.

If the other party finds theoretical errors, they can eliminate an incorrect answer first, saving a lot of time.

In fact, the critical issue for Jiang Cheng and the other person is the lack of time. If they had plenty of time this time, they could derive and verify every theory they both had.

Unfortunately, time is limited. Although Jiang Cheng can now focus on researching dark matter, in a while, he might not have the time to focus on this.

The Yinghe is currently heading to Mars, and once those astronauts reach Mars, he still has to be busy with landing matters, maybe leaving no time to care about the physics lab's concerns.

That's why the two are eager to prove their theories, because Jiang Cheng has limited time for this.

Both Jiang Cheng and Yang Jiqian are aware of this situation.

Perhaps the remaining time for Jiang Cheng can only derive and verify two or three theories.

So choosing which theories to focus on in the next step has become the focal issue of their argument.

Alright, let's follow your suggestion. We'll first look at each other's theories, then decide on which direction to research next.

Faced with the solution Jiang Cheng proposed, Yang Jiqian finally conceded.

She had no choice but to concede to Jiang Cheng, as he was her boss.

The two then exchanged their draft papers and started to examine each other's theoretical models seriously.

Yang Jiqian was now examining it very seriously, seemingly preparing to find loopholes in Jiang Cheng's theory and thereby strike against him.

Unfortunately, her idea was doomed to fail. How could there be obvious flaws in the theory Jiang Cheng proposed?

The hypothetical theories proposed by Jiang Cheng, even if proven wrong in the end, couldn't possibly have logical flaws.

These theoretical models were meticulously prepared by Jiang Cheng, and someone like Yang Jiqian wouldn't be able to see any problem.

Yang Jiqian originally planned to nitpick Jiang Cheng's theories, but found Jiang Cheng's theoretical models to be almost perfect, and she couldn't see any flaws.

Moreover, Jiang Cheng's theoretical models appeared very convincing, giving the impression that dark matter should exist in this model manner.

This fact hit Yang Jiqian hard, as she finally realized the vast gap between her and Jiang Cheng.

Comparing Jiang Cheng's proposed theoretical models, her own contributions seemed like garbage.

If talking about possibilities, Jiang Cheng's theory has the highest likelihood of being correct, and logically, his theory should be derived and verified first.

But how could Yang Jiqian easily admit defeat? So she began her own journey of nitpicking.

"Your theory seems to have a bit of a problem. It doesn't look very ideal and might not be correct.

She then began nitpicking within Jiang Cheng's theory, trying to make a fuss over minor things, akin to finding bones in an egg.

"Maybe you haven't understood it yet. This theory needs to be interpreted this way."

Unfortunately, finding bones in an egg was a very difficult task.

Whenever she pointed out some small issues in Jiang Cheng's theory, she faced relentless ridicule from Jiang Cheng, who quickly argued back to the point where she was speechless.

Most of the issues she pointed out were due to her own limited ability, not Jiang Cheng's problems.

After a final effort, she still couldn't find any issues within Jiang Cheng's theory.

As a result, after her nonsensical nitpicking, Jiang Cheng's theory appeared even more flawless.

It seems Yang Jiqian's attempt to nitpick was a complete failure, ironically proving Jiang Cheng's correctness on the side.

She ended up with nothing, but Jiang Cheng managed to find several issues on her side.

Your theory has a clear logical problem, and if this problem isn't solved, your theoretical model holds little value.

"And your other model has an even bigger problem. The flaws in this theoretical model are as large as the sky; it seems your starting point was wrong, which led to this result."

Jiang Cheng quickly pointed out the myriad of issues within Yang Jiqian's theories and immediately found the fundamental problems.

One of the theoretical models was even completely negated by Jiang Cheng, having been found with a fundamental error, proving it to be an incorrect model.

With one move, Jiang Cheng identified a heap of problems, leaving Yang Jiqian speechless.

After thinking for a while, she realized that the issues Jiang Cheng pointed out indeed existed.

If she couldn't resolve these issues, there'd be no point in proceeding with the subsequent work.

A problematic theory lacks the value for verification, as it inherently cannot be trusted, thus there's no point in deriving or verifying it.

After critiquing Yang Jiqian's theories, Jiang Cheng continued to strike at her.

I suggest you take these theories back for further research. If they aren't correctly revised, there's no point in presenting them for study.

Now, Jiang Cheng felt very pleased; he discovered the pleasure of criticizing others. This exhilarating feeling made him very happy, and he got more and more into it.