Super God-Level Top Student-Chapter 809 - 306: Look, This is What I Wanted_2

"We acknowledge that as humans, we might make one mistake or another, even in the evaluation of scientific awards. Humans are not infallible, but this imperfection is the greatest characteristic of human beings as the masters of this world.

However, one of the most valuable human qualities is our strong capacity to correct errors. When we realize a mistake, we try hard to rectify it and bring everything back to the right track. Whereas when controversies arise with artificial intelligence, the attribution of responsibility and decision-making becomes ambiguous.

Therefore, we call upon the public here: Please maintain the humanity in scientific evaluation, and protect it from the erosion of ruthless algorithms. Let us all preserve the purity and dignity of the quest for science, ensuring that the assessment of scientific achievements is still based on human intelligence, intuition, and ethics. Limit the disorderly use of artificial intelligence, and let the light of humanity continue to shine."

...

With many people adding fuel to the fire, this article completely went viral.

Not just in the academic circles, but even among the general populace.

For Dou Dou, its purpose was also achieved.

Just as the decision tree model predicted, a scientific award must first stir great discussion in the academic community and then spread to the world of ordinary people to be considered normal. After all, awards discussed first by the general public should be the ones like the Golden Rooster Award or the Oscars.

Because winning the recognition of scholars is much more difficult than conquering the general public.

Therefore, the popularity of the Qiaoze Natural Science Award must be fanned within the academic community first.

Through a series of plans by Dou Dou, the goal was smoothly achieved.

With the help of the grand influence that the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Nobel Prize have among the general public, many journalists noticed this article and began to reprint it.

And when people saw this article, it was bound to pique their curiosity, resulting in a desire to delve deeper.

Which organization launched an award judged by AI? And it caused such tension for the operators of the Nobel Prize? What happened in the academic world?

As long as there is curiosity, in this era where anyone can act as media, countless people get restless.

Not just those journalists who buzz around hot topics like flies, but also numerous self-media people, who began to keenly sense that there was a story here.

If on top of that, you have internet-embedded conscious artificial intelligences stirring things up, it wouldn't take much time for the recent series of events to blow up in the world of ordinary people.

"The Crawford Mathematics Prize? Is there really such an award?"

"Of course, it's the legendary mini-Nobel Prize!"

"It's outrageous, why wasn't Qiao Ze awarded? Oh, the head of the Science Academy personally amended it? Can it even be done like that?"

...

"Artificial intelligence judging awards? Never heard of that before. Aren't all the previous scientific awards done by recommendation?"

"Ha, you're living under a rock, aren't you? Go check the Xilin Institute of Mathematics' official website for a link about the Qiaoze Natural Science Award. Rumor has it Qiao Ze and his girlfriend donated five billion to establish a Qiao Ze Prize Science Foundation. The prize money is even a bit more than the Nobel's, and the entire process is controlled by artificial intelligence. The recommendation system has also been changed to self-nomination and invitation."

"Gotta check it out, bro, send me the link."

...

"Has mathematics in Huaxia become this strong? That Qiao Ze with over thirteen thousand points, and another mathematician I searched online is also incredible, with just over five thousand points?"

"Definitely. Haven't you seen how many achievements Qiao Ze has garnered in the past two years? This still doesn't include the recently proven conjecture; that hasn't been added yet."

"Eye-opener. I always thought Huaxia had never received significant awards in mathematics because it was weak in that field. When did such a big shot appear?!"

...

"Is there something wrong with the Crawford Prize? With such a huge point difference, how did they combine two people to receive the award?"

"Don't even mention it. I heard that initially, there was only one winner this year, the Frenchman. Later, due to immense pressure, Qiao Ze was added, and then it became two. It's said that the extreme choice made by the Academy president, Andrei, was due to this award controversy."

"I've always said, the world is full of shady dealings!"

... ƒreewebηoveℓ.com

Although hot topics appeared dramatically, and everyone might be interested in different aspects, with appropriate guidance, everything will eventually return to the desired direction.

In this regard, Dou Dou is clearly an expert.

Especially when countless discussions from abroad are translated back home, numerous people on Huaxia's internet also start to debate the Nobel and Qiaoze Natural Science Award, and Dou Dou can finally make a move with a clear conscience.

This is the other party starting without martial virtue, beginning to brainwash the ordinary people.

At this time, Dou Dou's internet celebrity qualities can come into play.

The first choice is still Weibo.

No matter whether the channel of release is solemn or not, as long as it has enough influence, that's all that matters.

"It is said that recently a completely untrustworthy foreign website questioned Dou Dou, leaving Dou Dou feeling so aggrieved. I'm forced to step forward and explain a couple of things. First, why did we design the Qiaoze Natural Science Award? Of course, because the traditional mode of prize evaluation is no longer keeping up with the new era's demands.

To put it more simply, the judging rules of traditional scientific awards (including the Nobel Prize) can no longer meet the steadily increasing intellectual demands of the general populace. Academia indeed has high thresholds, but the review process should not set high barriers for ordinary people."

For example, out of two mathematicians, one of them achieved a series of accomplishments in the recent two years that made almost all scholars in the field of mathematical research sure he could win all the math awards of the year, yes, all of them.