MTL - Match Point-Chapter 1404 Wrong root

Generally speaking, tennis broadcasts on TV stations are often divided into two types:

One is full cooperation and official broadcasting, that is, winning the broadcasting rights of the entire event. As for which one to broadcast, it is up to the TV station to decide.

This is the cooperation agreement signed between China's CCTV 5 and the Australian Open. This is also one of the Australian Open's comprehensive promotion strategies in the Pan-Pacific region.

One is partial cooperation, selective broadcasting, purchasing the official broadcasting signal of the event, and which game to broadcast live is determined by the event, that is, the international signal.

On the whole, the international signal is a panoramic live broadcast, mainly focusing on the games on the center court, but at the same time, it will take into account all games, update the progress and results of other games in a timely manner, and occasionally insert important scores and exciting rounds worthy of attention, covering the entire Wonderful race.

If the TV station plans to broadcast a specific game separately, and they judge that this game can win more ratings in their own country, then they need to purchase an additional broadcast right for this game separately, replacing the international signal, and the whole process is separate. Live stream this game.

The US Open last year was a typical example—

At the beginning, CCTV only purchased international signals; after Gao Wen was born, they purchased Gao Wen's game broadcast rights separately.

Here, we need to pay attention to why Federer is said to be the home of the world?

Part of the reason is that he travels around the world to compete, and the local fans will always support him the most, and the treatment is comparable to that of the host or even more than some host players.

Part of the reason is that his events are always the most popular when they are broadcast live on TV, and various countries and regions hope to purchase his event broadcast rights separately.

There is no doubt that Roland Garros is no exception; only, this time, the situation may have changed a little.

Sight, back to the present moment.

Clues, pieced together bit by bit, you can see the clues—

Isaac was going to teach him a lesson... not Gao Wen, but Federer.

For one thing, Federer was squeezed to Susan Lenglen.

Secondly, the two men's singles matches will be held in the second match at the same time.

This also means that, except for China, Switzerland, Spain and other countries and regions that have purchased separate broadcast signals, most of the rest of the world will broadcast the official international signal of the French Open. You can predict with your toes that the international signal should be the right one. Quasi-Philippe Chartier Stadium.

Of course, externally, Isaac's choice was "impeccable"—

Despite the high-profile Swiss Derby, Federer's global appeal is unparalleled, and Wawrinka is also a very important member of the "Challenger League".

But since this year, Gao Wen has become the leader of the Challenger League and the new generation of youth storms, completely disrupting the rule of the Big Four. From world rankings to competition champions to superstar temperament, Gao Wen's overall rise has been unstoppable. It seems to be the biggest hot spot right now.

The quarter-finals between Nadal and Gawain is a collision that has firmly occupied the top spot of the hot topic list since the draw of the French Open this year. , From any point of view, it is impeccable.

In terms of commercial considerations such as ratings and attendance, Isein is also invincible. This is definitely not an impulsive and reckless decision.

Maybe it's regrettable or sad, but Isein's choice is beyond reproach.

Moreover, Isein was able to show his tolerance, which was in stark contrast to Gawain's youthful vigor and sharp edge. He showed his sophistication and wisdom, and made Gawain a "junior". " position, while Isein firmly occupies the status of a senior elder.

one stone two bird.

On the bright side, Gao Wen's frontal attack was resolved invisibly, repaying hatred with kindness, and showing Isain's crisis public relations ability as the event director.

Secretly, giving Federer a dumb loss, although not a big deal, can make Federer's team uncomfortable and prove his status again—

He, the tournament director of the French Open and the Paris Masters, is also a figure in the French tennis world and even the world tennis world. He disdains to haggle with a child like Gao Wen, but it does not mean that he is timid and afraid. Federer confronted head-on.

Faced with such a situation, Federer may not be able to say much. If he is not careful, it may turn into an attack on Nadal and Gawain-do you think they are not worthy of the treatment of Philippe Chartier? Or is it hubris that Susan Lengren doesn't deserve her place?

With Federer's intelligence, it is absolutely impossible for him to express any opinions.

Isaac's move is not only majestic, but also clever—

Far more than killing two birds with one stone, it was simply killing multiple birds with one stone, turning the situation around with ease.

Otherwise, in the face of Federer's accusations and protests at that time, how could Isein have the confidence to say "fuss" in response? That's what he's capable of.

High, really high!

Wow!

There was an uproar.

One or two of the reporters are old foxes, and the twists and turns behind the schedule have all been sorted out in a flash.

Admiration, admiration, admiration...

More importantly, the reporters can also guess that Federer and Wawrinka, Nadal and Gao Wen, these four parties should not make any comments, no matter how the reporters attack or provoke, they will not respond positively to the venue arrangement This should be the end of the matter—

Even if they wanted to respond, the PR team blocked them.

Originally, the reporters were still waiting for a good show, but in the end, Isaac dismissed the whole incident lightly, so who had the upper hand?

Federer and Gawain?

not necessarily.

After all, Ethan just fired a group of security staff and banned a child from entering Roland Garros, nothing hurt.

It wasn't until six months into the future that people realized:

Although Federer and Gao Wen did not gain the upper hand, Isan once again proved that Jiang is still old and hot; but also, Isan also exposed his weakness.

Isein has been in a high position for many years, and he is used to giving orders condescendingly, refusing to admit mistakes and keeping pace with the times, so facing Federer's accusations, instead of reflecting on improving security work, he shifted all responsibilities to the staff, UU Reading www.uukanshu .com and put Federer in a bad position.

But Isein didn't realize that the factional enemies inside the French Tennis Association were waiting for him to make a move. His arrogance just became the incentive, and then became the opportunity for the enemies to push the internal storm of the Tennis Association, waiting for him to react , everything has gotten out of control.

So, did Ethan win?

nor.

For Federer and Nadal, and even for Wawrinka, they have been in professional tennis for long enough and have experienced similar incidents. They also clearly know that where there are people, there are right and wrong, and even the players union There are also many differences and controversies.

They are used to it.

But for Gao Wen, this is indeed the first time he saw a power struggle outside of a professional tennis game. He deeply realized that the relationship between tournaments, ATP and players is far from being as simple as it seems. It is not enough to be an iconic icon just to win the championship.

Far from enough.