I, Doctor in the US-Chapter 459 - 439: The Truth About Immigration

The movie "Hunger Games" is now basically unimpeded.

They can start filming directly.

Of course, this film still needs some time to set up the studio.

Fortunately, Hollywood is still feasible, at least the studio can be chosen freely.

And then there’s the outdoor scenes.

But that’s actually simple; just shoot them in Canada.

Or they could go to Australia.

After all, both countries, on one hand, have natural conditions very suitable for "Hunger Games", and on the other...

It is extremely easy for Americans to go to these two countries.

Canada has always emphasized its independence.

But isn’t it just like that saying?

Lacking what one boasts about.

Canada is like the backyard of the United States, and the most interesting thing about this country is that it is actually the same as the United States.

That is, it hopes for more people.

It’s not just about immigration.

But it’s not ordinary immigration either.

Immigrant countries like the United States and Canada have their own set of logic.

One has to understand clearly, whose countries are these in essence?

Ultimately, they are countries of the Angsa people.

Of course, actually the United States has been parasitized.

But let’s not talk about that parasitic issue now.

The key is, since the Angsa people regard themselves as the owners of this country, what kind of immigrants do they need?

Simply put, they need slaves.

This might sound a bit harsh.

But it is actually the case.

Just take a simple comparison between historical slaves and those foreign immigrants in these countries, or so-called barbarians, and it becomes clear.

For example, how do you treat slaves?

Give them food, give them drink, even help them find a wife, because only then can they reproduce. Those black slaves were actually like that.

Some American historians have actually studied their limited history.

In fact, before the Civil War, the slaves under the slave masters lived quite decent lives.

Many people surely don’t believe it.

But the logic is actually very simple, these slaves were actually the property of the slave masters.

Before the Civil War, to see who was wealthy was simply a matter of comparing who had more black slaves.

So, treating one’s property...right, it can’t be destroyed.

Surely enough food and drink were given, as for working conditions, well they couldn’t manage too much, and as for beating and scolding, that was certain.

Additionally, many male slave owners would forcefully take advantage of female black slaves, resulting in numerous mixed-race individuals.

But there is one critical aspect.

That is education.

Some slave owners were somewhat lenient, they even did not abuse the black slaves.

But they definitely adhered to one bottom line.

They absolutely would not educate black slaves.

All that’s needed is for them to understand the sound of the whip.

And now?

Anti-intellectualism!

The current United States and Canada are all anti-intellectual societies.

They always tout happy education, but in reality, it is the same as how they treated slaves.

Only, back then, they simply didn’t educate.

And now, they have changed, they do educate, but they don’t care about the results of education.

This may be something that many Chinese cannot understand.

Zhou Mo Sen is very clear that many Chinese actually have not truly understood what happy education means.

Because it can be seen from many internet arguments.

Many Chinese who don’t understand happy education will criticize China’s education vehemently, then say, look at the United States, their happy education, children are happy, parents are happy, how great.

Actually, these people don’t get it at all.

The truth about happy education is actually what’s mentioned above; it’s about not caring about the outcome.

To describe it in more detail, you can use the Japanese perspective.

Education is not for the purpose of advancing in school.

Yes, this is the guiding spirit written in the document of Japan’s happy education, also known as ’relaxed education’.

Do you understand now?

Further explaining, happy education is actually for students, teachers indeed teach, and institutions educate.

But teachers and schools don’t care about how students perform.

That is, whether students learn or not, or to look at it directly, what kind of achievements they obtain.

Schools and teachers do not care at all!

You should get it by now.

In China, to evaluate a school’s quality, we look at one thing.

The rate of students advancing to higher education.

That is, how many kids get into good universities or high schools each year.

The best high school in a city, the only standard of evaluation is how many students get into Qingbei each year.

This standard is something that the Chinese people absolutely recognize.

But in the United States, Canada, or any country implementing happy education, like Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom, etc.

All these countries, their schools don’t care at all how many graduates enter prestigious schools in a year.

Even more, they don’t even care whether they produce graduates who can enter prestigious schools.

They don’t even care about their own school’s graduation rate, keep this in mind, it’s the graduation rate.

They don’t care at all!

The most obvious example is some high schools in black communities.

It can be confirmed, these high schools do indeed charge no tuition.

However, the graduates of this school are composed in such a way.

One-third can graduate, one-third end up in prison, and one-third go out to find work, becoming laborers.

So, are there none who get into universities?

There are, but they’re really very few.

Surely someone will ask, what about those rich people?